Teams Review QA
Use this page to review Teams Help before publishing or adding screenshots.
Product Review
| Question | Pass condition |
|---|---|
| Does the overview explain Teams purpose? | A reader knows Teams is for private organization work. |
| Are private locations separated from marketplace locations? | Teams does not explain public selling as private setup. |
| Are teams, members, and access explained clearly? | Readers understand organization membership and role-dependent visibility. |
| Are analytics and availability described safely? | Pages explain purpose without inventing formulas. |
| Is SSO explained without exposing configuration detail? | SSO is described as sign-in, not internal security setup. |
Support Review
| Question | Pass condition |
|---|---|
| Can admins troubleshoot access? | Access and permissions page gives a clear check order. |
| Can support triage integrations? | Slack, Microsoft Teams, and SSO handoff templates exist. |
| Are common booking/location/resource issues covered? | Troubleshooting and examples cover likely support paths. |
| Are private member details protected? | Pages warn against real member data in screenshots and messages. |
Engineering Review
| Question | Pass condition |
|---|---|
| Does help match route ownership? | Teams pages cover private organization routes only. |
| Are unsupported permission specifics avoided? | Exact permission matrix is marked as a content gap. |
| Are integrations public-safe? | No provider secrets or configuration internals are exposed. |
| Are screenshot rules clear? | Screenshot plan requires demo data and hidden SSO/provider details. |
Copy Review
| Question | Pass condition |
|---|---|
| Is the writing simple? | Admin guidance uses checklists and examples. |
| Is it American English? | No British spelling in operator-facing copy. |
| Is it practical? | Pages explain what to check before changing organization setup. |